Summary of the Security Council Extends Sanctions Regime against Sudan, Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2750 (2024)
Introduction:
On 12 September 2024, the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2750 (2024), which extends the sanctions regime against Sudan until 12 September 2025. These sanctions include asset freezes, travel bans, and an arms embargo, with the aim of curbing the flow of arms into conflict zones and pressuring individuals and entities complicit in escalating violence in Sudan, particularly in Darfur. The Security Council's decision reflects the international community's continued concern over the deteriorating security and humanitarian situation in Sudan, marked by ongoing violence, displacement, and human rights abuses.
Key Points:
Sanctions Extension:
- The Security Council extended the sanctions regime, emphasizing the critical role of these measures in restricting the flow of arms into Darfur and targeting individuals responsible for catalyzing violence. The renewal will remain in effect until 12 September 2025, with a decision on further extension to be made before that date.
Ongoing Humanitarian Crisis:
- The United States representative highlighted the daily struggles faced by the people of Darfur, who continue to endure intensified fighting, human rights violations, and restricted access to humanitarian aid. Renewing the sanctions was seen as a necessary step to alleviate the conflict and restore peace and security.
Human Rights Abuses by Warring Parties:
- The UK representative pointed to systematic human rights violations committed by both the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). The international community called on states to refrain from providing military support to either side and to use diplomatic influence to push for negotiations.
Compliance with Arms Embargo:
- The Republic of Korea stressed the importance of compliance with the arms embargo by all warring parties and Member States. Given the spread of conflict across Sudan, the Council was urged to implement more concrete measures to ensure the effectiveness of the sanctions regime.
China’s Support and Caution:
- China supported the sanctions renewal but emphasized that sanctions should be a means to an end and not a tool for political pressure. The representative urged the warring parties to prioritize their country’s interests and adhere to international humanitarian law.
France and Russia’s Perspectives:
- France condemned all violations against civilians and called for foreign actors to refrain from arming or supporting the parties involved in the conflict. Russia, on the other hand, supported the Sudanese government’s efforts to restore stability in Darfur but criticized external interventions that were not coordinated with central authorities.
Accusations Against Foreign Interference:
- Sudan’s representative accused the United Arab Emirates of playing a significant role in prolonging the conflict by supporting the RSF militias and exploiting Sudan’s gold resources. The representative called for international pressure on the militias to compensate Sudan for economic losses caused by looting and destruction, labeling the actions of these groups as terrorism.
Calls for Targeted Sanctions:
- Several members of the Council, including Sudan, called for more targeted sanctions against militias and entities supporting them, specifically focusing on holding external actors accountable for fueling the conflict.
Humanitarian Assistance and Strategic Peace Plan:
- Sudan’s representative stressed the need for greater UN assistance in addressing the humanitarian crisis and internal displacement caused by the conflict. He also called for the development of a strategic peace plan that would address Sudan’s concerns and exert pressure on aggressors.
Conclusion:
The extension of sanctions against Sudan reflects the Security Council’s commitment to addressing the ongoing conflict and humanitarian crisis in the country, particularly in Darfur. With ongoing violence, human rights abuses, and external interference exacerbating the situation, the resolution aims to curb the flow of arms and hold perpetrators accountable while emphasizing the need for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict.
Alkrty
September 12 2024
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق